Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis

Zhang Pinghao; Jiang Gang; Lin Guifang

doi:doi:10.11648/j.si.20231106.20

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis

Zhang Pinghao^*, Jiang Gang, Lin Guifang

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 11, Issue 6)

Received: 7 November 2023 Accepted: 28 November 2023 Published: 29 November 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Public bidding is one of the important methods of competitive procurement, and the evaluation methods generally include comprehensive scoring method, lowest evaluated price method, and evaluated lowest bid price method. The commonly used method in equipment procurement is the comprehensive evaluation method, which involves three types of scores: business, technology, and price. The bidder with the highest total score will win the bid. When designing a comprehensive scoring standard, the bidding unit usually decomposes it into several items within the specified total score of this category, and then refines the quantitative criteria for each item's score. However, it often overlooks the internal connection of the three categories of scores, resulting in the winning bidder with the highest comprehensive score not necessarily meeting the core needs of the bidding party. In response to the typical problem of grading and ranking bidding units in current competitive procurement, this article intends to establish a bid evaluation model using the comprehensive weight analysis theory of rough set theory. Based on this, detailed evaluation criteria are designed, which can more scientifically and reasonably judge the scores of bidding units in the evaluation, and is conducive to improving the objectivity of the evaluation results; At the same time, through simulation case calculations, when there is more than one bidding unit with the highest final score, the comparative analysis of the evaluation result matrix is equivalent to a comprehensive analysis of many influencing factors such as price and technical score, which to some extent solves the problem of difficulty in selecting suitable winning bidders through detailed evaluation criteria.

Published in	Science Innovation (Volume 11, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.si.20231106.20
Page(s)	284-287
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Rough Set, Competitive Procurement, Bid Evaluation Model

References

[1]	范勇红, 曾穗恒, 钟铭. 三种评标办法在国企招标中的应用 [J]. 中国招标, 2023 (11): 126-128.
[2]	石彬. 招标文件编制过程中存在的问题及合理化建议 [J]. 中国招标, 2023 (08): 137-138.
[3]	秦晨君. 基于主成分分析的装配式建筑劳务分包招评标探讨 [J]. 中国招标, 2023 (08): 123-126.
[4]	孙慧. 两种常用评标办法在通信招标项目中的应用 [J]. 中国招标, 2023 (06): 116-118.
[5]	刘庆贺, 张秋妹. 水利水电工程招标投标问题及评标机制研究 [J]. 中国招标, 2022 (09): 142-143.
[6]	汤骏. 招标采购差别化评标技术原理及其实现 [J]. 南通职业大学学报, 2022, 36 (01): 93-99.
[7]	王琳, 周志云, 鲍安红. 基于直觉模糊集的建筑工程EPC模式招标评标方法研究 [J]. 四川水泥. 2022 (03): 91-93.
[8]	瞿万超. 招标评标管理工作中智能化技术的应用 [J]. 天津科技, 2021, 48 (07): 100-101+104.
[9]	杨林娟, 沈士明. 基于粗糙集理论的故障树重要度分析 [J]. 南京工业大学学报, 2007 (1): 60-64.
[10]	吴丽莉. 工程造价全过程控制方法的研究 [D]. 吉林: 吉林大学, 2008.
[11]	何菲菲, 王飞, 李红. 建设工程招标评标模型研究及应用 [J]. 河北工程大学学报 (自然科学版), 2013 (6): 103-105.
[12]	董洁. 大型装备项目融资流程要点 [J]. 船舶物资与市场. 2021 (03): 93-94.
[13]	杨峰, 徐鹏, 黄鹏等. 工程、物资采购招标优化评标办法的思考 [J]. 四川建材. 2021, 47 (03): 199-200+210.
[14]	黄小雁, 章凌云. 模糊综合评价法在施工招标综合评标法中的应用 [J]. 福建建筑. 2021 (02): 85-89.
[15]	邓乃文. 重新招标与重新评标的区别及适用 [J]. 建设科技. 2020 (19): 70-73.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Pinghao, Z., Gang, J., Guifang, L. (2023). Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis. Science Innovation, 11(6), 284-287. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Pinghao, Z.; Gang, J.; Guifang, L. Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis. Sci. Innov. 2023, 11(6), 284-287. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20231106.20

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Pinghao Z, Gang J, Guifang L. Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis. Sci Innov. 2023;11(6):284-287. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20231106.20

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20231106.20,
  author = {Zhang Pinghao and Jiang Gang and Lin Guifang},
  title = {Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {11},
  number = {6},
  pages = {284-287},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20231106.20},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20231106.20},
  abstract = {Public bidding is one of the important methods of competitive procurement, and the evaluation methods generally include comprehensive scoring method, lowest evaluated price method, and evaluated lowest bid price method. The commonly used method in equipment procurement is the comprehensive evaluation method, which involves three types of scores: business, technology, and price. The bidder with the highest total score will win the bid. When designing a comprehensive scoring standard, the bidding unit usually decomposes it into several items within the specified total score of this category, and then refines the quantitative criteria for each item's score. However, it often overlooks the internal connection of the three categories of scores, resulting in the winning bidder with the highest comprehensive score not necessarily meeting the core needs of the bidding party. In response to the typical problem of grading and ranking bidding units in current competitive procurement, this article intends to establish a bid evaluation model using the comprehensive weight analysis theory of rough set theory. Based on this, detailed evaluation criteria are designed, which can more scientifically and reasonably judge the scores of bidding units in the evaluation, and is conducive to improving the objectivity of the evaluation results; At the same time, through simulation case calculations, when there is more than one bidding unit with the highest final score, the comparative analysis of the evaluation result matrix is equivalent to a comprehensive analysis of many influencing factors such as price and technical score, which to some extent solves the problem of difficulty in selecting suitable winning bidders through detailed evaluation criteria.
},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis
AU  - Zhang Pinghao
AU  - Jiang Gang
AU  - Lin Guifang
Y1  - 2023/11/29
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20231106.20
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 284
EP  - 287
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20
AB  - Public bidding is one of the important methods of competitive procurement, and the evaluation methods generally include comprehensive scoring method, lowest evaluated price method, and evaluated lowest bid price method. The commonly used method in equipment procurement is the comprehensive evaluation method, which involves three types of scores: business, technology, and price. The bidder with the highest total score will win the bid. When designing a comprehensive scoring standard, the bidding unit usually decomposes it into several items within the specified total score of this category, and then refines the quantitative criteria for each item's score. However, it often overlooks the internal connection of the three categories of scores, resulting in the winning bidder with the highest comprehensive score not necessarily meeting the core needs of the bidding party. In response to the typical problem of grading and ranking bidding units in current competitive procurement, this article intends to establish a bid evaluation model using the comprehensive weight analysis theory of rough set theory. Based on this, detailed evaluation criteria are designed, which can more scientifically and reasonably judge the scores of bidding units in the evaluation, and is conducive to improving the objectivity of the evaluation results; At the same time, through simulation case calculations, when there is more than one bidding unit with the highest final score, the comparative analysis of the evaluation result matrix is equivalent to a comprehensive analysis of many influencing factors such as price and technical score, which to some extent solves the problem of difficulty in selecting suitable winning bidders through detailed evaluation criteria.

VL  - 11
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Zhang Pinghao

Naval Research Institute, Beijing, China

Contact Email
Jiang Gang

Naval Research Institute, Beijing, China
Lin Guifang

Naval Research Institute, Beijing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Pinghao, Z., Gang, J., Guifang, L. (2023). Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis. Science Innovation, 11(6), 284-287. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Pinghao, Z.; Gang, J.; Guifang, L. Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis. Sci. Innov. 2023, 11(6), 284-287. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20231106.20

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Pinghao Z, Gang J, Guifang L. Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis. Sci Innov. 2023;11(6):284-287. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20231106.20

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20231106.20,
  author = {Zhang Pinghao and Jiang Gang and Lin Guifang},
  title = {Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {11},
  number = {6},
  pages = {284-287},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20231106.20},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20231106.20},
  abstract = {Public bidding is one of the important methods of competitive procurement, and the evaluation methods generally include comprehensive scoring method, lowest evaluated price method, and evaluated lowest bid price method. The commonly used method in equipment procurement is the comprehensive evaluation method, which involves three types of scores: business, technology, and price. The bidder with the highest total score will win the bid. When designing a comprehensive scoring standard, the bidding unit usually decomposes it into several items within the specified total score of this category, and then refines the quantitative criteria for each item's score. However, it often overlooks the internal connection of the three categories of scores, resulting in the winning bidder with the highest comprehensive score not necessarily meeting the core needs of the bidding party. In response to the typical problem of grading and ranking bidding units in current competitive procurement, this article intends to establish a bid evaluation model using the comprehensive weight analysis theory of rough set theory. Based on this, detailed evaluation criteria are designed, which can more scientifically and reasonably judge the scores of bidding units in the evaluation, and is conducive to improving the objectivity of the evaluation results; At the same time, through simulation case calculations, when there is more than one bidding unit with the highest final score, the comparative analysis of the evaluation result matrix is equivalent to a comprehensive analysis of many influencing factors such as price and technical score, which to some extent solves the problem of difficulty in selecting suitable winning bidders through detailed evaluation criteria.
},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Research on Competitive Procurement Evaluation Model Based on Rough Set Importance Analysis
AU  - Zhang Pinghao
AU  - Jiang Gang
AU  - Lin Guifang
Y1  - 2023/11/29
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20231106.20
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 284
EP  - 287
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20231106.20
AB  - Public bidding is one of the important methods of competitive procurement, and the evaluation methods generally include comprehensive scoring method, lowest evaluated price method, and evaluated lowest bid price method. The commonly used method in equipment procurement is the comprehensive evaluation method, which involves three types of scores: business, technology, and price. The bidder with the highest total score will win the bid. When designing a comprehensive scoring standard, the bidding unit usually decomposes it into several items within the specified total score of this category, and then refines the quantitative criteria for each item's score. However, it often overlooks the internal connection of the three categories of scores, resulting in the winning bidder with the highest comprehensive score not necessarily meeting the core needs of the bidding party. In response to the typical problem of grading and ranking bidding units in current competitive procurement, this article intends to establish a bid evaluation model using the comprehensive weight analysis theory of rough set theory. Based on this, detailed evaluation criteria are designed, which can more scientifically and reasonably judge the scores of bidding units in the evaluation, and is conducive to improving the objectivity of the evaluation results; At the same time, through simulation case calculations, when there is more than one bidding unit with the highest final score, the comparative analysis of the evaluation result matrix is equivalent to a comprehensive analysis of many influencing factors such as price and technical score, which to some extent solves the problem of difficulty in selecting suitable winning bidders through detailed evaluation criteria.

VL  - 11
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download